MEASURING POVERTY IN THE UNITED STATES.

MEASURING POVERTY IN THE UNITED STATES. Kids, economic statistics—like baseball statistics— have to be used with care and this Robert Samuelson article on poverty statistics makes a point which is usually overlooked. (link via Realclearpolitics). Immigration of really poor people into the United States necessarily makes the percentage of poor people higher than it would otherwise be. It can then seem that poverty has increased and that this is a failure of the economy. It is difficult to collect the information, but the comparison over time should include the incomes for the people before they immigrate. If the immigrants get better jobs and higher incomes in the United States, they are better off. Samuelson says that: “Poverty ‘experts’ don’t dwell on immigration, because it implies that more restrictive policies might reduce U.S. poverty.” I think that the opposite is true—ignoring immigration when discussing poverty ignores an important argument for immigration: immigrants are made better off—world poverty is alleviated. There are lots of factors to consider, of course, but the difficulty of collecting data on the lives of immigrants before they arrive should not prevent the improvement of the lives of immigrants from being measured and taken into account.

This entry was posted in Economics. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to MEASURING POVERTY IN THE UNITED STATES.

  1. Mary Jane Schaefer says:

    My grandmother Christina Perrotta Vetrone came to the United States in the early 20th Century. (I should know the exact date as Phil actually found her Ellis Island papers, and they’re filed somewhere.) She was born and raised in Italy before she came to the US to marry Agostino Vetrone, my grandfather. I asked her which country she preferred living in. She said, “Oh, here, here. Much more food here than in Italy.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *