CAPITAL FLOWING INTO RICH COUNTRIES.

CAPITAL FLOWING INTO RICH COUNTRIES. I often see comments that there is something unnatural about capital flows from emerging economies to developed countries. For example, the following is from The Economist of September 14, 2006 (from a file I used to maintain of things I would blog about if I had a blog). “The flow of capital from poor countries to the richest economy in the world is exactly the opposite of what economic theory would predict. According to the textbooks, capital should flow from rich countries with abundant capital, such as America, to poorer ones, such as China, where capital is relatively scarce, so returns are higher…… It seems perverse that poor countries today prefer to buy low-yielding American government bonds when they could earn higher returns by investing in their own economies.” I think this view does not take into account the position of an investor in an emerging economy. For such an investor, stocks and bonds of developed countries must seem very attractive, if only for diversification. Investments in emerging countries tend to be high risk and a local investor is probably already exposed to country risk. Investors outside the country are better positioned to bear that risk.

This entry was posted in Economics. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to CAPITAL FLOWING INTO RICH COUNTRIES.

  1. Annalisa says:

    Perhaps your observations at the close of this post have bearing on my argument with Lee about the definition of capitalism. My stance was that capitalism is a system in which every individual is trying to maximize his or her profits. As I understand it, investors may have national pride but mostly they are interested in making money off of their investments, so of course they pick the most high yielding and least risky. I imagine this is why people opposed to capitalism call it selfish and other, similarly critical terms.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *