DOES A BROKEN HEART MATTER?

DOES A BROKEN HEART MATTER? Daniel Gilbert in STUMBLING ON HAPPINESS argues that people are much more resilient than they think. He advances the proposition that, “Like so many things, getting jilted is more painful in prospect and more rosy in retrospect” (page 175). He also says that he would bet a good bottle of wine that if you took a survey of people who had been jilted at the altar that more would say it was the best thing that ever happened to them than who would say it was the worst thing that ever happened to them. I have always agreed with Auden’s view of the matter: “No man ever said with satisfaction, ‘I almost married the girl I love’ or a nation, ‘We almost won the war’” (THE DYER’S HAND, page 431). Gilbert’s position runs contrary to most of Western literature. I can think of two movies which support the proposition that one can live happily after lost love: THE UMBRELLAS OF CHERBOURG and TITANIC (yes, says Gilbert, the heart will go on).

This entry was posted in Literature. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to DOES A BROKEN HEART MATTER?

  1. Annalisa says:

    Like so many things pertaining to emotions, I think that broken hearts feel so damn awful at the time that you can’t imagine living happily ever after until you do. Losing a close friendship is eerily similar to having a broken heart; I thought I wouldn’t get over losing a friend of mine, but I did. Was it the best thing that ever happened to me? I don’t know if I can say. But I can certainly live happily and well without her. At present I am more distant from the pain than I ever thought I would be.

  2. Mary Jane says:

    Clearly, Gilbert is one of the blessed who has never had his heart good and broken.

  3. Pingback: Pater Familias » TEARS ARE ROUND, THE SEA IS DEEP.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *