TAKING A PHILOSOPHICAL VIEW OF CRICKET. The Economist (April 25) had a fine obituary describing Richard (Richie) Benaud, a great cricket player (captain for Australia), and later a star commentator on cricket.

The last paragraph of the obituary is a wonderful statement of a sportsman’s view of his sport:

“Cricket… was above all a game of good and ill fortune. Pitches were ever-variable, from the dirt paddocks and bouncy concrete of his boyhood to the rain-spongy, quaint grass of England…. Weather and light were unpredictable. Players had on and off days, balls misbehaved, and umpires made weird decisions. It all had to be taken philosophically; for at the back of it lay the long, noble history he relished, beginning on English village greens ….”

I admire Benaud’s opinion. However, I am, as my family will attest, incapable of taking that view of baseball. I’m pretty good with bad bounces, but not very good with umpires.

This entry was posted in Sports. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.