DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. Jerome Groopman (an oncologist) and Pamela Hartzband (an endocrinologist) have written YOUR MEDICAL MIND, which analyzes the role of patient choices in medical decisions. (I have relied on this review by Daniel J. Levitin and this review by Laura Landro.) The premise of the book is that for many medical decisions, there is no black and white answer so that often patients will have to make decisions based on probabilities. The doctor and the patient should work together in doing this. The authors (husband and wife) propose two useful dichotomies: first, patients tend to be maximalists or minimalists. Dr. Groopman was a maximalist until a bad experience with back surgery made him more risk averse. Dr. Hartzband identifies herself as a minimalist, using medicines only when absolutely necessary. Second, a patient can be biased either for or against new technology. Is a patient willing to try a new medical treatment before it has been “proved”? Is a patient willing to let nature take its course perhaps with the aid of “alternative medicine”. The two dichotomies result in four classifications. Mary Jane and I tend to be maximalists who are open to new technology.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT). (1)
- Nick: I love the display board, still. The in-person draft, the age of the league, and my memories of the league from...
- WERE SAVAGES NOBLE? (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: Does he do a correlation between rates of murder and the chances of getting caught? I suppose in...
- BACON—MORE THINGS IT CAN DO. (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: RAW bacon, I presume. Whoever came up with the idea in the first place?
- RESEARCH ON SYNESTHESIA. (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: Does this qualify, that part in Gatsby when Nick and Jay are talking about Daisy’s voice...
- WERE CAVE PAINTINGS ABSTRACT ART? (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: And our guide at Font de Gaume (sp?) explained there were paintings we couldn’t see, in a...
- WHY DON’T HUMANS HAVE STRIPES? (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: Or you can go to Brooks Brothers and buy a nice shirt.
- ENFORCING THE MAGNA CARTA. (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: I don’t understand why the barons couldn’t enforce the provision that had just put...
- THE ENFORCEABILITY OF THE GREECE-EUROZONE AGREEMENT. (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This new business, the robbery of the Museum of Greek Antiquities, “because the staff was...
- LEARNING FROM COMIC STRIPS—CALVIN AND HOBBES. (1)
- Nick: I remember seeing those in our Calvin & Hobbes collections that I dutifully kept next to my bed for years....
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT). (1)
Meta
One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to diagnose and treat prostate cancer are a case in point. Despite new surgical techniques, the risks of post-operative incontinence, impotence, etc. are still substantial. These are compounded even more by the considerable risks of infection in hospitals. These make me a minimalist willing to postpone any surgery that is not immediately needed, but a maximalist when the alternatives are few.
A doctor I know describes a successful hospital outcome as having the patient discharged with no more problems than when he/she was admitted.