HAMLET AND DOCTOR WHO. Mary Jane and I were unfamiliar with David Tennant. When I e mailed Lee Bryant to alert him to the RSC HAMLET, he wrote back: “I loved David Tennant as The Doctor on Doctor Who, so I’m going to record this.” I replied: “So Tennant does have good classical credentials.” Mary Jane asked me if I was joking, but I was quite serious. I’ve always said that a lot of non-Shakespearian actors should do Shakespeare. I used to give Jackie Gleason and Carol Burnett as examples. Now, John Goodman, best known for playing Roseanne’s husband, is considered to be a great Falstaff, and I would love to see him do it. Good acting is good acting. Patrick Stewart says here that Shakespearean training helped in Tennant’s doing Dr. Who and Stewart’s doing Star Trek. Stewart says: “I think that the experience that we get in making a 400-year-old text work is exactly what you need for giving credibility and believability to fantasy, science fiction, and the like.” Let me suggest this as a thought experiment: Suppose you had only seen Michael Gambon or Kenneth Branagh or Maggie Smith in the Harry Potter movies or Ian McKellan only as Gandalf. You would feel comfortable casting them in a Shakespeare play and you’d be right.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- THE EUROZONE—A CHICKEN GAME WHERE EVERY MEMBER CAN BLOW IT UP? (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This is not a matter of chicken. These are all turkeys.
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
Meta
Doing Shakespeare comes with a couple of little problems. One is the archaic language. You have to study it and internalize it so the lines sound natural and inevitable, as, indeed, they were written. But there’s also the problem of “Oh, my God, this is Shakespeare. I have to be GRAND.” No, don’t be grand. Be humble before greatness. Put yourself at its service.
And didn’t that sound like Thomas Carlyle? I’m sure Phil is gritting his teeth right now.