BEING FRIGHTENED OF GERMANY. It turns out that there was another set of fears about German reunification—fears that never occurred to me at the time. The same week that the Russian documents were reported on, the British foreign office released documents about fears that arose after the Berlin Wall fell. This article in the London Times recounts a conversation at a luncheon at the Elysee Palace two months after the Wall fell. A British diplomat recorded that President Mitterrand said that “reunification would cause the re-emergence of the ‘bad’ Germans who dominated Europe” and that “a unified Germany could win more ground than Hitler ever did.” In hindsight, it appears obvious that Britain and France, who had fought two wars with Germany in the century would have trepidations about reunification. I must have failed to realize that because I was thinking in terms of the Cold War, which had dominated the news in my lifetime.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
Meta
George H. W. Bush rarely gets the plaudits he deserves for what Mandelbaum called his strategy of “reassurance.” He let the two Germanies negotiate with occupying powers staying in the background, thus presenting the Soviets with a fait accompli. Who would have imagined that the USSR would agree to a unified Germany within NATO and depart from their most prized sattelite without any hint of force! Bush provided guarantees for the nervous Eastern Europeans and western allies that the US would not tolerate the emergence of a belligerant or expansive Germany.
Too bad that his son’s record taints his brillant foreign policy legacy. How ironic that the Obama national security team seems confortable with a kind of “realism” and multilateralism akin to that of George H. W. Bush.
Pingback: IT LOOKS EASY AFTERWARDS (COMMENT). | Pater Familias