PAUL KRUGMAN’S NOBEL PRIZE. Kids, Paul Krugman has won the Nobel Prize for Economics, and you can understand some of the ideas for which he won. This article in the Economist has a good introduction to some of his models, and I am tracking the article in what follows. Begin with one of the factual puzzles which Krugman addressed. Previous theories of international trade had predicted that countries that had different resource endowments would engage in trade. A country would export goods in which it had a comparative advantage (in terms of its factors of production) for goods in which it had a comparative disadvantage. The article gives the example of Portugal selling wine for which its climate is suited. The problem that had to be explained was that countries with similar resources engage in a lot of trade; more than half of Germany’s exports to France are things that France also exports to Germany. Krugman identified a number of factors which affect the location of companies and the directions of trade, including consumers’ desire for variety and economies of scale. (You could think of France and Germany as Volkswagen and Renault and get some feel for one possible solution.) One of the nice things about Krugman’s work is that there is a set of solutions depending on facts. He describes his model as a tool, but it could also be looked at as a set of tools. Here is a paper by Krugman (by way of the Marginal Revolution blog) which summarizes some of his ideas and shows the number of variables which enter into his models.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
Meta