LEARNING HOW TO CHOOSE HOW AND WHAT YOU THINK. After David Foster Wallace’s tragic suicide, the Wall Street Journal reprinted much of his commencement address at Kenyon College in 2005. One of the points that Wallace made was that: “[L]earning how to think really means learning how to exercise some control over how and what you think. It means being conscious and aware enough to choose what you pay attention to and to choose how you construct meaning from experience.” He suggests that a liberal arts education is a good way to deal with boredom because it teaches you to think interesting thoughts. I think his examples indicate that he does not have in mind the kind of languorous ennui that is found in Chekhov. Rather, he seems to be talking about frustration—the kind of frustration that results from being delayed in doing things we really want to do—traffic delays and chores like grocery shopping. He emphasizes that this kind of thing is inevitable—now that we don’t have personal servants—and that we have to prepare to live with it. Wallace also suggests that the value of a college education is that it enables us to empathize with others and thereby avoid frustration. He says that because of a college education: “I can choose to force myself to consider the likelihood that everyone else in the supermarket’s checkout line is just as bored and frustrated as I am, and that some of these people probably have harder, more tedious and painful lives than I do.” It is interesting that for Wallace, developing empathy is difficult and complicated, requiring years of education.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
Meta
George Eliot’s Middlemarch makes the same point. We are all “well wadded” in our stupid self-centeredness, and we have to make a strenuous effort to make real to ourselves the feelings of others and the claims of those feelings on us. Dorothea, for all that she’s not a normal heroine, makes a heroic effort to feel with the feelings of others. And that’s what saves her, ultimately.