THE TRICOLON. The beginning of the article linked in yesterday’s post had a familiar ring. The sentence, “Travel is exhausting, it’s expensive, and, as one football player chanted upon approaching Stonehenge, it’s ‘o-ver-ra-ted!’” reminded me of another sentence—which, upon reflection, turned out to be the advice supposedly given by Lord Chesterfield to his son about sex: “The pleasure is momentary, the position ridiculous, the expense damnable.” Further reflection brought back memories of my high school Latin teacher Lois Larson pointing out that Roman orators liked using groups of three so much that they had a name for the figure of speech: “tricolon.” Wikipedia says, “A tricolon (pl. tricola) is a sentence with three clearly defined parts (cola) of equal length, usually independent clauses and of increasing power.” The example that wikipedia gives is “I came; I saw; I conquered.” The article says that Lincoln was fond of the tricolon, as in “”We cannot dedicate — we cannot consecrate — we cannot hallow…” The tricolon is still effective.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- THE EUROZONE—A CHICKEN GAME WHERE EVERY MEMBER CAN BLOW IT UP? (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This is not a matter of chicken. These are all turkeys.
- PLAYING WITH MATCHES NEAR A GASOLINE TANK. (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: Why would the French care? As long as they take down Britain?
- NORWAY’S CHRISTMAS BUTTER SHORTAGE. (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: Christmas with a butter cookie shortage–in Scandinavia. This isn’t even Scrooge. This...
Meta
There has got to be a way to take vacations, rather than journeys. Journeys are rich in memories, and photos, and high points. But they are not relaxing. Sometimes, the journey has to be within instead.
The group of teachers I’m taking to Lesotho and South Africa in late June is very computer oriented and constantly finding things we will see on you-tube and the internet. I’ve been wondering whether anything will seem new and unique when we are actually there. Perhaps fewer people will feel the need to make the actual journey and will experience places vicariously and intellectually instead, as Mary Jane suggests. It would also be ecologically far better than all the jet contrails in the sky.
What a hypocrite I am sitting here by the ocean on the Swedish West Coast. How could you-tube ever encompass the fresh air, the wind, the view or the feeling of the place?
By the way I might just as well have put this comment on Phil’s post today. (I think he’s just what Marx would call a vulgar utopian, not a scientific socialist at all! Can a true revolutionary live in Norwalk? Maybe, just as Marx lived on Engel’s father’s money)
Pingback: I MAY BE VULGAR, BUT I’M NOT A UTOPIAN (COMMENT). | Pater Familias
Pingback: MARXISM AND FARCE. | Pater Familias
Pingback: A SPEECH WRITER LOOKS AT THE MIDTERM ELECTIONS. | Pater Familias