DAVID HARE AGREES WITH ME. I have previously posted here and here on the New York Time critics who suffer because they don’t like the theater. The New York Post (the newspaper of record in our household for forty years) has on Page Six today this account of an encounter at a dinner between the distinguished British playwright David Hare and the Jill Abramson, the managing editor of the New York Times. “Abramson was seated next to Hare and immediately launched into a speech about the supposed superiority of the Times’ theater coverage.” Hare replied, “‘You must be kidding. The Times has contempt for the theater, especially Broadway, and especially plays.’” Abramson’s reply implied that it is not important that a New York Times theater critic like the theater: “Listen, it is not our obligation to like or care about the theater. It’s our obligation to arbitrate it. We are the central arbiter of taste and culture in the city of New York.”
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- ADAPTING GATSBY. (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: I think these are crucial, important decisions, what to leave out of any literary work, maybe any...
- DAMIEN HIRST—AN ART MARKET BUBBLE?. (1)
- Kate Bush: I hope you enjoy my visit to the Damien Hirst show as much as I did The Technical Impossibility of...
- THE MOST IMPORTANT EPISODE OF THE SIMPSONS ? (COMMENT). (1)
- Nick: Homer does has success as the team’s best hitter until Mr. Burns places a bet with a rival factory owner...
- THE “RIGHT TO EDIT”. (1)
- Lee: A relevant Simpsons clip.
- ULYSSES—VIRGINIA WOOLF LIKED THE BOOK, DESPISED THE AUTHOR. (3)
- A DEFENSE OF INVASIVE SPECIES. (3)
- Dick Weisfelder: Today’s Toledo Blade has an article on the importation of live Asian carp to Canada to serve...
- Lee: The downside is that red squirrels are way cuter than their gray cousins. Hitchens on the subject.
- THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT). (5)
- frank martin: Have been in a an Al only Roto league since 91… started at Ohio University were we all went to...
- DEATH OF A BUMBLEBEE. (1)
- Nick: By contrast, I remember witnessing the entire thing. I was surprised by Annalisa’s reaction and...
- ANOTHER VOTE ON UMBRIDGE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: When I look back at one of the Potter books, it’s usually this one. There are just a lot of...
- THE SCARIEST VILLAIN IN HARRY POTTER? (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: Didn’t we all meet her somewhere in grade or high school?
- ADAPTING GATSBY. (1)
Meta
For all that people fall over themselves to praise the Times, I have yet to hear anything good about it, or read anything in it that impressed me.
Even Curt Schilling called out the Times for the willful, stubborn, and (shocker!) arrogant ignorance with which Murray Chass covered baseball and its new statistics.
Wow, the Times is arrogant even when dealing with sports? I hear you get a free lifetime subscription if you can tell the front page from the editorial section.
Pingback: Pater Familias » IS THE NEW YORK TIMES THE ARBITER OF TASTE AND CULTURE?