Category Archives: Science

APOPHENIA AND SPORTS JOURNALISM.

Posted on October 9, 2011 by Philip

APOPHENIA AND SPORTS JOURNALISM. In yesterday’s cartoon, the first character says: “A weighted random number generator just produced a new batch of numbers.” The other character replies: “Let’s use them to build narratives.” The caption at the bottom says: “ALL … Continue reading →

Posted in Baseball, Journalism, Science, Sports | Leave a comment

APOPHENIA—THE CARTOON.

Posted on October 8, 2011 by Philip

APOPHENIA—THE CARTOON. I posted here on September 25 about apophenia, and I have since been encountering discussions of the phenomenon although they don’t use the new word. Nate Silver even linked to this cartoon which dramatizes the phenomenon. The site … Continue reading →

Posted in Baseball, Economics, Journalism, Science, Sports | Leave a comment

DAVID HOCKNEY: “THERE’S A LOT MORE TO BE SEEN.”

Posted on October 6, 2011 by Philip

DAVID HOCKNEY: “THERE’S A LOT MORE TO BE SEEN.” I want to draw attention to the beginning of Martin Gayford’s article about David Hockney: “One of your basic contentions, I say to the British artist David Hockney, is that there … Continue reading →

Posted in art, Science, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

FLATNESS AND THE SINGLE-LENS VIEW.

Posted on October 5, 2011 by Philip

FLATNESS AND THE SINGLE-LENS VIEW. I posted here on the theory of Margaret Livingstone, a Harvard professor of neurobiology, that it is an advantage for an artist to have poor depth perception. (Professor Livingstone uses the example of Rembrandt.) Hockney’s … Continue reading →

Posted in art, Science, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

APOPHENIA.

Posted on September 25, 2011 by Philip

APOPHENIA. I came across an unfamiliar word in a review by Laura Marcus in the Times Literary Supplement (September 9). The word is “apophenia”, and while the word is new to me, I encounter the phenomenon almost every day. Laura … Continue reading →

Posted in Science | 2 Comments

FOLDIT REVISITED—A SCIENTIFIC SUCCESS FOR VIDEOGAMERS.

Posted on September 19, 2011 by Philip

FOLDIT REVISITED—A SCIENTIFIC SUCCESS FOR VIDEOGAMERS. I posted here a year ago about Foldit, “a videogame with 57,000 registered users, in which players score points by finding chemically stable configurations for chains of protein molecules.” Now, as this Yahoo article … Continue reading →

Posted in Science | 1 Comment

TWIN TALK.

Posted on August 30, 2011 by Philip

TWIN TALK. My parents always told us that there was a period when my brother Elmer and I spoke what they called “twin talk”, a language that nobody else was able to understand. This article in Slate by Jon Lackman … Continue reading →

Posted in Science | Leave a comment

FORCING TWINS TO BE DIFFERENT.

Posted on August 29, 2011 by Philip

FORCING TWINS TO BE DIFFERENT. My brother and Elmer were always treated as identical by my parents, but they encountered resistance from the school system as we got older. The theory was that twins had to develop their own individuality. … Continue reading →

Posted in History, Science, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

TWINS THAT LOOK ALIKE ARE IDENTICAL.

Posted on August 28, 2011 by Philip

TWINS THAT LOOK ALIKE ARE IDENTICAL. The Slate series has an article on twins by Barry Harbaugh, an identical twin, which corresponds to my experience. Harbaugh and his brother had been told they were fraternal.My brother Elmer and I were … Continue reading →

Posted in Science | Leave a comment

WHY IDENTICAL TWINS ARE DIFFERENT FROM EACH OTHER.

Posted on August 27, 2011 by Philip

WHY IDENTICAL TWINS ARE DIFFERENT FROM EACH OTHER. Slate has had a special feature with good articles on twins, which, of course, are always interesting to me. Brian Palmer in this article points out the flaws in any scientific study … Continue reading →

Posted in Science | Leave a comment