Category Archives: Science

THE COLOR REVOLUTION.

THE COLOR REVOLUTION. I have lived through a number of revolutions without realizing that there was a revolution going on. One of the revolutions that I have lived through is the “Color Revolution”. The Atlantic has this review of Regina … Continue reading

Posted in Economics, History, Science | Leave a comment

CAN QUALITY OF LIFE INCREASE EVEN THOUGH ENERGY SUPPLIES CAN’T GROW?

CAN QUALITY OF LIFE INCREASE EVEN THOUGH ENERGY SUPPLIES CAN’T GROW? One way that the Finite Physicist differs from economists is that he considers improvements in quality of life to be separate from economic growth. He asks the question: …if … Continue reading

Posted in Economics, History, Science | Leave a comment

PHYSICAL LIMITS ON THE USE OF ENERGY RATHER THAN THE SUPPLY OF ENERGY.

PHYSICAL LIMITS ON THE USE OF ENERGY RATHER THAN THE SUPPLY OF ENERGY. Kids, economists have typically responded to Limits of Growth arguments by emphasizing the importance of substitution—consumers and producers will substitute other ways of making or saving energy … Continue reading

Posted in Economics, History, Science | 2 Comments

THERMODYNAMIC LIMITS TO ENERGY GROWTH.

THERMODYNAMIC LIMITS TO ENERGY GROWTH. I have often encountered arguments on the physical limits to economic growth that are based on a fixed supply of energy or on adverse consequences of global warming. The “Finite Physicist” makes a different argument … Continue reading

Posted in Economics, History, Science | Leave a comment

MALTHUSIANS AND PHYSICISTS; CORNUCOPIANS AND ECONOMISTS.

MALTHUSIANS AND PHYSICISTS; CORNUCOPIANS AND ECONOMISTS. The Limits to Growth model goes back to Malthus. Over the last 40 years, the model has been a focus of a lot of the arguments between Malthusians and what the Economist has called … Continue reading

Posted in Economics, History, Science | Leave a comment

EXPONENTIAL ECONOMIST MEETS FINITE PHYSICIST (COMMENT).

EXPONENTIAL ECONOMIST MEETS FINITE PHYSICIST (COMMENT). Henry Nejako in a comment here called my attention to what Henry—rightly—calls “a clever dialogue between a physicist and and economist about the limits to economic growth, set forth in four acts and an … Continue reading

Posted in Economics, History, Science | Leave a comment

STEPHEN HAWKING’S REPHRASING OF THE QUESTION.

STEPHEN HAWKING’S REPHRASING OF THE QUESTION. Rosenbaum concludes his review by saying: “Holt leaves us with the question Stephen Hawking once asked …, “Why does the universe go through all the bother of existing?”

Posted in Science | Leave a comment

REDEFINING NOTHING.

REDEFINING NOTHING. After insisting that explaining how something really big came from something very small is not the same thing as explaining how something came from nothing, Holt and Rosenbaum endorse a restrictive definition of “nothing”. Rosenbaum says: “[Holt] sets … Continue reading

Posted in Science | Leave a comment

WHY IS THERE BEING RATHER THAN NOTHING? THE BIG BANG DOESN’T ANSWER THE QUESTION.

WHY IS THERE BEING RATHER THAN NOTHING? THE BIG BANG DOESN’T ANSWER THE QUESTION. As I have said, Mary Jane does the metaphysics and philosophy in our household. There are questions in philosophy that I gave up on a long … Continue reading

Posted in Science | Leave a comment

“A HIGGS-BOSON PARTICLE WALKS INTO A BAR….”

“A HIGGS-BOSON PARTICLE WALKS INTO A BAR….” The Wall Street Journal (July 7-8) recounts the following joke that is being told on Twitter: “A Higgs-Boson Particle walks into a bar. The bartender doesn’t understand.”

Posted in Science | Leave a comment