SAMUEL JOHNSON, PHILOSOPHER. With my obtuse approach to philosophical issues, I have always treasured Samuel Johnson’s refutation of Berkeley’s argument that the objects of the world are just inventions of the mind. (Johnson kicked a stone, saying “I refute it thus.â€) Until I read the Gawande article I linked to yesterday, I had not realized the argument that Johnson was refuting. Berkeley had argued that we have no direct perception of objects; we have only sensations from which we infer the existence of objects. (And therefore, perhaps there are no objects at all).
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- Gary Nuetzel on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Francesca on EATING PEAS WITH A KNIFE.
- avon wilsmore on CHEATING IN CHAMPIONSHIP BRIDGE.
- Anonymous on THE LANGUAGE WEIRDNESS INDEX.
- James Friscia on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Lickity Splitfingers on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- David Quemere on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Nicholas Schaefer on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
Meta