HARMFUL HEADLINES.

HARMFUL HEADLINES. The author of the article, Gina Kolata, is a good science writer, but I don’t understand how or why the article was written, and it seems to me that it can be harmful. The article indicates that the American Cancer Society is “quietly” working on a statement about mammograms to be published next year, and yet the article quotes a spokesman for the Society giving what amounts to vague statements depreciating the value of mammograms. A biostatistician at Sloan-Kettering is quoted as saying; “I am concerned that the complex view of a changing landscape will be distilled by the public into yet another ‘screening does not work’ headline.” Ironically, the headline of the article is: “Cancer Society, in Shift, Has Concerns on Screenings.” And—again ironically—The first sentence of the article is: “The American Cancer Society, which has long been a staunch defender of most cancer screening, is now saying that the benefits of detecting many cancers, especially breast and prostate, have been overstated.”

This entry was posted in Journalism, Science. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to HARMFUL HEADLINES.

  1. Nick says:

    No way. Is her given name really, “Gina Kolata”? You sure she’s science writer and not an exotic dancer?

  2. Lee says:

    “If you like Giña Kolatas / Gettin’ caught in the rain.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *