GIVING TO MAXIMIZE A SOCIAL CONNECTION. I have posted several times, including here, about the ideas of SCROOGENOMICS, a book by Joel Waldfogel which argues that “Christmas gifts should be in cash because the recipient knows what he wants better than the giver does.” The behavioral economist Dan Ariely—the author of PREDICTABLY IRRATIONAL—had an article in the Wall Street Journal (December 17-18) which discusses how behavioral economics has a better understanding of gift giving than Scroogenomics provides. Ariely analyzes a motive for some giving that is not considered by Scroogenomics: maximizing a social connection. Behavioral economics advises that you avoid perishable gifts (say, flowers). Ariely recommends a gift that is used intermittently so that the recipient is reminded of you whenever it is used. He suggests an electric mixer.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- Gary Nuetzel on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Francesca on EATING PEAS WITH A KNIFE.
- avon wilsmore on CHEATING IN CHAMPIONSHIP BRIDGE.
- Anonymous on THE LANGUAGE WEIRDNESS INDEX.
- James Friscia on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Lickity Splitfingers on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- David Quemere on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Nicholas Schaefer on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
Meta
You shouldn’t give cash, because someone may find it impossible to spend money on himself/herself, even if it’s gift money. (There are people like this.) If you want to treat someone, treat them in a way that gives them no wiggle-room to deprive themselves.