ENACTING A RULE AND NOT ENFORCING IT. The NFL’s handling of the helmet-to-helmet controversy resembles other approaches to controversial issues. The rulemaker creates a rule and then doesn’t enforce it, so that the rulemaker has an answer if either side of the controversy complains. Here, it looks as if in the short run, there is going to be a lot of inconsistency in enforcement. It also looks as if the emphasis on enforcement after the game is over is going to continue so that the the team whose player suffered the illegal hit will continue to be disadvantaged.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- Gary Nuetzel on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Francesca on EATING PEAS WITH A KNIFE.
- avon wilsmore on CHEATING IN CHAMPIONSHIP BRIDGE.
- Anonymous on THE LANGUAGE WEIRDNESS INDEX.
- James Friscia on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Lickity Splitfingers on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- David Quemere on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Nicholas Schaefer on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
Meta
Pingback: ECONOMIC REGULATION AND HELMET HITS. | Pater Familias