CHOOSING AN ONCOLOGIST. Kids, this philosophical debate about the foundations of statistics is important. You may have noticed that I am a Bayesian. When we had to choose an oncologist, one of the factors turned out to be how they thought about statistical evidence (of course, brilliance, kindness and humanity were the most important factors). In that crucial first meeting, Dr. Rosenberg, the wonderful oncologist your mother chose, related statistics to his medical knowledge in the way a Bayesian would. The other oncologist that we talked to seemed to be reciting numbers out of context.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- Gary Nuetzel on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Francesca on EATING PEAS WITH A KNIFE.
- avon wilsmore on CHEATING IN CHAMPIONSHIP BRIDGE.
- Anonymous on THE LANGUAGE WEIRDNESS INDEX.
- James Friscia on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Lickity Splitfingers on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- David Quemere on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Nicholas Schaefer on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
Meta