HOW I WOULD PLAY THE ULTIMATUM GAME. It seems to me that if I am a subject—a “competitor‗in the ultimatum game, and I am challenged by the other player to take a small amount because a small amount is better than nothing, and I take the small amount, I will think that I lost that game. Unless the sum of money is large enough for me to ignore the competitive aspects of the game, I am not going to let the ultimatum giver beat me. It may not be economically rational, according to the experimenters, but the other player and I are both going to wind up with nothing, and I am going to think it’s a draw. If it’s a game, what matters is winning, not a few tokens as consolation. I think that the experiment says more about the nature of games than it does about economic rationality.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- Gary Nuetzel on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Francesca on EATING PEAS WITH A KNIFE.
- avon wilsmore on CHEATING IN CHAMPIONSHIP BRIDGE.
- Anonymous on THE LANGUAGE WEIRDNESS INDEX.
- James Friscia on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Lickity Splitfingers on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- David Quemere on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Nicholas Schaefer on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
Meta