WHY GARFUNKEL IS RIGHT TO READ THE CLASSICS. When I retired, I thought, “Now, I have the time to read all the books I want.†I soon realized that I can’t even keep up with the new books I want to read. Garfunkel’s list is a sobering reminder that even reading at a steady pace, there is a limit to the number of books you can read in your lifetime. There isn’t time to read anything, but the very best books—or any kind of mystery story.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- Gary Nuetzel on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Francesca on EATING PEAS WITH A KNIFE.
- avon wilsmore on CHEATING IN CHAMPIONSHIP BRIDGE.
- Anonymous on THE LANGUAGE WEIRDNESS INDEX.
- James Friscia on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Lickity Splitfingers on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- David Quemere on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Nicholas Schaefer on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
Meta
I always have this thought, of being buried in books, when I go into a bookstore. Especially when I’m picking up required reading. I think, “I’m here to pick up this – but this and this and this look so much more interesting.”
Something about academic reading will never be the same as reading for pleasure. Is there any way to make a career out of reading for pleasure?
Time Enough at Last! Talk about sobering. I bet Paul Simon hasn’t got through half as many books as Art.
In response to Nick’s question: I suppose if you become an author yourself. But, then, you’d have a professional interest; so it still wouldn’t be the same. Perhaps we all have to content ourselves with reading only for pleasure only some of the time. I think your father always reads for pleasure because he finds everything interesting.