A USE FOR CONFEDERATE BONDS. People are still arguing whether the South could have won the Civil War. The Wall Street Journal this week reported that two economists, Kim Oosterlinck and Marc Weidenmier, have found a way to use the prices of Confederate bonds on an Amsterdam market to measure what European investors (presumably somewhat neutral) thought about the chances of the Confederacy winning the war. In effect, in this paper they convert the market for Confederate bonds into the kind of political futures market that you can find here. Their results indicate that European investors gave the South a 42% chance of winning before the battles of Gettysburg and Vicksburg at the beginning of July, 1863. Six months later, the investors gave the South only a 15% chance of winning. Since one of the things that the South was hoping for was favorable intervention from Europe, the lower appraisal of its chances reduced its chances of winning. Conclusions would be that observers who were willing to risk money on the wager thought at one point that the South had a good chance (almost 50/50) of winning and that the battles of Gettysburg/Vicksburg were a turning point.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- Gary Nuetzel on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Francesca on EATING PEAS WITH A KNIFE.
- avon wilsmore on CHEATING IN CHAMPIONSHIP BRIDGE.
- Anonymous on THE LANGUAGE WEIRDNESS INDEX.
- James Friscia on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Lickity Splitfingers on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- David Quemere on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Nicholas Schaefer on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
Meta
This is Mary Jane. I don’t know why I’m logged in as Phil. But, anyway, I think this was an utterly brilliant idea, to evaluate the European conception in monetary terms. Put your money where your mouth is. What is even more interesting to me, however, is how something brilliant seems so OBVIOUS once someone else thinks of it. I believe one of Phil’s early intellectual problems was that he had valuable insights and then didn’t push them because they suddenly appeared obvious to him.