JOURNALISTS AND SOURCE-GREASERS

JOURNALISTS AND SOURCE-GREASERS. I had not seen in discussions of journalistic ethics any acknowledgment of the conflict of interest inherent in the use of anonymous sources. It certainly does not seem to be a major worry for journalists. But the leaker may leak selectively. Worse, the quid pro quo for the leak is often that the story will be spun to favor the leaker. The reader has no way of knowing that the story has been slanted and cannot evaluate the sources of the story. The leak is also building up favors in the journalist’s favor bank. Now I see in Mickey Kaus’s blog Kausfiles a name for a story which is slanted toward an anonymous source. It’s a “source-greaser.” I don’t know whether this is a term of art for journalists or if Kaus coined the phrase. Either way, more power to him.

This entry was posted in Journalism. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to JOURNALISTS AND SOURCE-GREASERS

  1. Lee says:

    I thought astroturfing was the cleverest term ever when I first heard it.

  2. Nick says:

    The amount of flaws with journalism today is beyond count. Truly nauseating how such an important field can suck so completely without criticism.

  3. Pingback: Pater Familias » JOURNALISTS AND SOURCE GREASERS (REVISITED).

  4. Pingback: “BEAT-SWEETENER PIECES.” | Pater Familias

  5. Pingback: MICHAEL KINSLEY ON SOURCE GREASERS. | Pater Familias

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *