RESTAURANT CRITICS AND THEATER CRITICS. Yesterday, I quoted a theater critic criticizing LES MISERABLES because he got bored with the turntable that was changing the scenery. He also proudly announced that he had never gone to see the show in the sixteen years of its first run in New York, and then gave it a short negative review. I see that another critic gave LES MIZ a negative review because it lacks irony. I am not giving names here because I want to generalize about all theater critics. The speculation: Years from now people will look back on New York (and American?) culture at the beginning of this century and conclude that this was the golden age of restaurants. Eating was important. Theater was not. Restaurant reviews are usually raves. Restaurant critics like to eat. They love to describe their meals in glowing terms. Theater reviews are usually negative. Theater critics are long suffering types who find only one or two plays a year that are worthy of their attention.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- Gary Nuetzel on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Francesca on EATING PEAS WITH A KNIFE.
- avon wilsmore on CHEATING IN CHAMPIONSHIP BRIDGE.
- Anonymous on THE LANGUAGE WEIRDNESS INDEX.
- James Friscia on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Lickity Splitfingers on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- David Quemere on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Nicholas Schaefer on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
Meta
Pingback: Pater Familias » Blog Archive » SUFFERING THEATER CRITICS