DON’T REJECT KEYNES. Kids, you will be reading claims in the future that Keynes should be ignored because his ideas were unsuccessful in dealing with this great recession. I know you will be reading that because many people are saying that now. My opinion is that Keynesian thinking has not been tried. I say Keynesian thinking advisedly, for the reasons I gave in the last posts. (Remember that I am a Keynesian.) I have looked at macroeconomic developments through Keynesian glasses since 1961, and the Keynesian explanations of those developments always seemed plausible. I think that I have lived through two successful applications of Keynesian policies during those 50 years: Kennedy’s and Reagan’s. (Reagan did not say his policy was Keynesian, but there was a combination of fiscal easing and monetary tightening.) Both Kennedy and Reagan included measures to encourage increased investment. Kennedy had an investment tax credit and Reagan had accelerated depreciation. There has been little discussion of encouraging investment in the last couple years. I think that the uncertainties about future health care regulations, financial regulations and tax rates for 2011 and beyond have had a discouraging effect on new investment and new hiring. Of course, I can’t prove it, but I don’t think that the case against Keynes has been proved or can be proved either. The next time there is a recession, look at Keynes to help you understand what’s happening.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- THE EUROZONE—A CHICKEN GAME WHERE EVERY MEMBER CAN BLOW IT UP? (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This is not a matter of chicken. These are all turkeys.
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
Meta