GOING BACK TO KEYNES—THE IMPORTANCE OF INVESTMENT. Professor Glaeser observed that “For decades, the economics profession had been moving away from Keynes….” One indication that economists have moved away from Keynes is that while the name of Keynes has been often invoked during the past two years, much of the discussion has reduced Keynes’s thinking to the simplified issue of whether larger government deficits can stimulate the economy and by how much. The effect of government policy on the amount of private investment has rarely mentioned in the last two years, and, despite the great importance of aggregate private investment for Keynes, private investment is almost never mentioned in discussions of Keynesian thinking. Keynes wrote a great book, THE GENERAL THEORY OF EMPLOYMENT, INTEREST AND MONEY, which can be found (in its entirety!) here. Note that “Book IV” (one of six “Books”) is entitled “The Inducement to Invest.” In his discussion of the determinants of investment, Keynes stresses the importance of expectations of investors. Keynes says in Chapter 11 of his discussion of “The Inducement to Invest” that “Two types of risk affect the volume of investment….The first is the entrepreneur’s or borrower’s risk and arises out of doubts in his own mind as to the probability of his actually earning the prospective yield for which he hopes.” Another chapter in Keynes’s discussion of the “Inducement to Invest” (Chapter 12) is devoted to “The State of Long-Term Expectation.” In it points out that: “The outstanding fact is the extreme precariousness of the basis of knowledge on which our estimates of prospective yield have to be made. Our knowledge of the factors which will govern the yield of an investment some years hence is usually very slight and often negligible.” Thus, for Keynes, aggregate private investment is very important and subject to great volatility because the people who make investments can know so little about the future.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
Meta