WHERE IS EUGENE O’NEILL?

WHERE IS EUGENE O’NEILL? Terry Teachout asks where Eugene O’Neill is on David Mamet’s list. A clue is in the emphasis that Mamet gives to “poetry.” Teachout quotes Mamet: “‘It is the vulgate, and is as poetic as the sports page or the blues,’ he writes of common American speech in THEATRE.” I think that my earlier post explains what happened to O’Neill. The American vernacular of the early part of the twentieth century is very much out of fashion—considered to be almost corny. The language of O’Neill, Tarkington, Runyan, O. Henry is held against them. A problem with the use of vernacular is that language changes.

This entry was posted in Literature, Theater. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to WHERE IS EUGENE O’NEILL?

  1. Mary Jane Schaefer says:

    A plus for the use of vernacular is that it preserves the language of a particular time and place, and the taste and smell of humanity as well. My old “friend” Bulwer-Lytton tried to write universally, so that his works would live through the ages. Talk about stilted, fake eloquence!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.