LEGOS AND CONCEPTUAL ART. I find a lot of conceptual art unsatisfactory, but I love the Lego project. 1. A lot of conceptual art bears only a few moments of looking. If you watch people at an exhibit of conceptual art, they will glance at a work for a few moments, take in the concept and move on. 2. Each Lego work is a new experience, rather than a single concept. 3. The works are beautiful. 4. Most important to me is that the Legos make me look harder and differently at buildings. 5. The Lego projects reflect craftsmanship. 6. If you like concept art because you can talk about concepts, the Lego projects provide lots of material for abstract generalizations: the contrast between bright colors and stone, the contrast between modern industrialized plastic and artisanal stone, the playfulness of toys and the seriousness of buildings, the contrast in scale between the Legos and the blocks of stone, the impermanence of stone and the seeming permanence of plastic, the parallels between building with blocks and building with stone—-it’s the same process after all….
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- Gary Nuetzel on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Francesca on EATING PEAS WITH A KNIFE.
- avon wilsmore on CHEATING IN CHAMPIONSHIP BRIDGE.
- Anonymous on THE LANGUAGE WEIRDNESS INDEX.
- James Friscia on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Lickity Splitfingers on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- David Quemere on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Nicholas Schaefer on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
Meta
Yes, if you think about it, plastic is less erodible than stone, but there’s also a paradox: Legos seem less permanent because they are less massive, seemingly poorer at load-bearing, more toy-like.
Pingback: THE IMPERMANENCE OF LEGOS (COMMENT) | Pater Familias