ANGRY ACADEMICS—THE RHETORIC OF “DERANGED KILLERS.” My favorite example of the anger which can arise among academics comes from a dispute among classicists. I found it hard to find a link that explained what happened over ten years ago, but whatever happened gives a flavor of how heated academic disputes can become. It seems that one classicist felt strongly enough about the rhetoric in an adverse review to report him to the FBI as perhaps being the Unabomber. This article contains a correction that quotes the classicist as posting the following on a classics listserv: “My interaction with the FBI in this endeavor is pertinent because Hanson should, in the interests of fair disclosure, acknowledge that I voluntarily went to a law enforcement agency and likened his and his collaborator”s views to that of a deranged killer when he is asked to assess my work and my life.”]
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
Meta
Now this is something that if you read it in a novel you’d say, “Oh, come on, too far fetched.” On the other hand, Oscar Wilde put himself into a courtroom he had every interest in staying out of, knowing for himself what his actual behavior had been. And, even on the stand, this most brilliant of men couldn’t say neutral, unincriminating things. He had to be amusing, even if it meant ruining his life. Poor Oscar.
Pingback: ACADEMICS BEHAVING BADLY—THE ASH TRAY ARGUMENT. | Pater Familias