ARE TWINS DIFFERENT FROM “NORMAL PEOPLE”?

ARE TWINS DIFFERENT FROM “NORMAL PEOPLE”? The weekend Financial Times has a review by Rosie Blau of four fiction books about twins. One of the books is TWIN STUDY: STORIES by Stacey Richter. I am an identical twin and have posted several times about being a twin, so I read the review with interest. I was brought up short by Blau’s quotations from Richter’s book. Blau notes that “twin children seem natural and adorable”, but then juxtaposes a quote from Richter (evidently from Richter’s protagonist, who is a twin): “adult twins seem aberrant, even to me….a trick of genetics, a dirty trick.” Later in the review Blau quotes the twin protagonist as saying that people study twins because “they want to know what we mean for normal people.” For myself, I have always believed that twins are “natural and adorable”—whether they are children or adults. I know there is an opposite view, but I am always surprised when I encounter it.

This entry was posted in Literature, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to ARE TWINS DIFFERENT FROM “NORMAL PEOPLE”?

  1. Dick Weisfelder says:

    There are twins, but then there are Schaefers………

  2. Mary Jane Schaefer says:

    Phil always told me, very matter of factly, that he and Elmer always knew they were cute because twins are, de facto, cute.

  3. Mary Jane Schaefer says:

    And make people smile.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.