NOVELISTS AS SNOBS. Hemingway and Salinger had a tendency to rate people. I posted here on Mary McCarthy’s observation that Salinger and Hemingway divided the world into allies and enemies and that CATCHER IN THE RYE is “based on a scheme of exclusiveness.” Jonathan Leaf notes that “…many of the best novelists have been snobs and phonies…. Thackeray, in part as self-criticism, wrote his Book of Snobs. Arnold Bennett loved yachting and especially liked to dress to go yachting. Faulkner wore a pretend peg-leg for a time and claimed to have lost his leg in ‘the war’ — which he never served in.”
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- Gary Nuetzel on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Francesca on EATING PEAS WITH A KNIFE.
- avon wilsmore on CHEATING IN CHAMPIONSHIP BRIDGE.
- Anonymous on THE LANGUAGE WEIRDNESS INDEX.
- James Friscia on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Lickity Splitfingers on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- David Quemere on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Nicholas Schaefer on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
Meta
Perhaps each novel is a world of its own; each author a creator. After a while, he/she thinks creating makes the author a God. How to keep up the image, except by posing and judging?
I do think that having control of the fate of his characters does often go to the writer’s head.
Pingback: NOVELISTS CONDESCENDING TO THEIR CHARACTERS. | Pater Familias