FLAUBERT’S CONTEMPT. Flaubert has the same kind of contempt for the characters in MADAME BOVARY that Salinger has in THE CATCHER IN THE RYE, without the protective screen that the first person narration by Holden Caulfield provides. That is, it is possible to take Salinger’s rejection of most people as really that of the troubled young narrator. But Flaubert hated the bourgeoisie and that hatred is reflected in his hatred of his characters. Of course, Flaubert, the author, had an unfair advantage over his characters. First you throw the fish in the barrel, and then you shoot them. Flaubert claimed that Madame Bovary was himself, but I don’t believe it.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- Gary Nuetzel on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Francesca on EATING PEAS WITH A KNIFE.
- avon wilsmore on CHEATING IN CHAMPIONSHIP BRIDGE.
- Anonymous on THE LANGUAGE WEIRDNESS INDEX.
- James Friscia on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Lickity Splitfingers on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- David Quemere on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Nicholas Schaefer on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
Meta
Pingback: FLAUBERT’S CONTEMPT REVISITED. | Pater Familias