<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE CATCHER IN THE RYE&#8212;A GENERATIONAL DIFFERENCE? (COMMENT).</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philipschaefer.com/2009/08/21/the-catcher-in-the-rye-a-generational-difference-comment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philipschaefer.com/2009/08/21/the-catcher-in-the-rye-a-generational-difference-comment/</link>
	<description>Theories, observations, and articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:04:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annalisa</title>
		<link>http://philipschaefer.com/2009/08/21/the-catcher-in-the-rye-a-generational-difference-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-2831</link>
		<dc:creator>Annalisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipschaefer.com/?p=2796#comment-2831</guid>
		<description>If I had known when you asked me about Catcher in the Rye what Nick&#039;s response was, I would&#039;ve just said, &quot;Seconded.&quot;  He said it better than I did.  At least now I have the opportunity to say that with regards to Peanuts: I completely agree with Nick; seconded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had known when you asked me about Catcher in the Rye what Nick&#8217;s response was, I would&#8217;ve just said, &#8220;Seconded.&#8221;  He said it better than I did.  At least now I have the opportunity to say that with regards to Peanuts: I completely agree with Nick; seconded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://philipschaefer.com/2009/08/21/the-catcher-in-the-rye-a-generational-difference-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-2829</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipschaefer.com/?p=2796#comment-2829</guid>
		<description>My objection to Charlie wasn&#039;t his patient suffering - it was that he was really not very bright, and that the jokes simply were not funny in the slightest. If we keep talking about Peanuts and Catcher in the Rye people are going to think I&#039;m that hated beast - the Elitist Cynic Under The Age of 30</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My objection to Charlie wasn&#8217;t his patient suffering &#8211; it was that he was really not very bright, and that the jokes simply were not funny in the slightest. If we keep talking about Peanuts and Catcher in the Rye people are going to think I&#8217;m that hated beast &#8211; the Elitist Cynic Under The Age of 30</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

