A QUIBBLE ABOUT RANDOM PROCESSES.

A QUIBBLE ABOUT RANDOM PROCESSES. David Adler in his article says: “But we are also fooled by nearly random processes that look random, even if they aren’t, because the differences are too subtle for us to notice.” Kids, I would think of the results of an “ordinary person” flipping a coin as still being a random process—only the mean of the random process is .51 rather than .50.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>