EVERYBODY IN THE INFIELD. Malcolm Gladwell had an article about a girls basketball team (twelve and under) which had great success playing a full court press. The article turned out to be controversial (google new yorker gladwell basketball if you are curious). One of the criticisms of the article is that of course a press works well against young athletes who don’t have the skills of older players. The article reminded me of a time when my brother Elmer and I were in college and had a friend–Bill–who was coaching a team of young boys at a summer day camp. It must have been softball because the kids were young. It was the worst team in the league. They hadn’t come close to winning a game and they were very discouraged. This was long before THE BAD NEWS BEARS, but that is what it was like. Some had completely lost interest. We chatted and one of us had the thought that at that age the weak players were put in the outfield where they couldn’t do anything if a ball was hit near them. We wound up with a proposal that Bill would put all the players in the infield. The next time we saw Bill he reported success. The boys were tremendously excited by the new plan. There was lots of infield chatter. And a strange thing happened. The coach of the other team felt that he had to counter this new tactic. He did it by having his team bunt. And keep bunting. The way I remember it, Bill’s team won.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- THE EUROZONE—A CHICKEN GAME WHERE EVERY MEMBER CAN BLOW IT UP? (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This is not a matter of chicken. These are all turkeys.
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
Meta
The solution you guys came up with was ingenious. But what was the opposition coach thinking? Was he being nice? Why would you bunt if you have a zillion infielders waiting to field it? Unless he thought the infielders were SURE to mess up? Hitting to the outfield over their heads, if it could be done reliably, was clearly the way to go if he wanted to win.
Years ago a team of law students won the intramural championship at William and Mary. I was told that all five of the players were marathon runners, and they pressed throughout every game. The teams they were pressing were all young and in pretty good shape; it seems unlikely that the chanpions had more basketball skills than all those other teams. At even the professional level superior depth has effects that can be obvious at the end of games.