SAVING BRUTALIST BUILDINGS—PAUL RUDOLPH.

SAVING BRUTALIST BUILDINGS—PAUL RUDOLPH. It seems strange that buildings that were built only fifty years ago are now threatened by the wrecking ball, but technological change—think of electrical requirements, for example—has been enormous. Another reason is the unpopularity of some of the buildings. I posted here about how a lot of people just don’t like concrete. Adela Louise Huxtable had an article in the Wall Street Journal for February 25 about Boston’s City Hall and Paul Rudolph’s Art and Architecture Building at Yale, two buildings which she says are representatives of Brutalism. “The name Brutalism —from the French beton brut, the raw concrete used by Le Corbusier and favored by modernists — is more commonly used today as a term of opprobrium by a public that profoundly dislikes the style’s rough textures and powerful forms.” Huxtable clearly admires the Art and Architecture Building, calling it a “brilliant, virtuoso performance.” Here is a picture of it. The building has now been restored. Apparently, the building was only saved for restoration because of the “high cost and extreme difficulty of demolishing solid concrete.”

This entry was posted in Architecture. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to SAVING BRUTALIST BUILDINGS—PAUL RUDOLPH.

  1. Sean says:

    Built only 50 years ago?!? Some were only built 40 or 35 years ago and are still threatened.

    We live in a throw-away American-Idol culture with a five minute attention span.

  2. Philip says:

    In the seventies, preservationists were fighting for buildings that were less than 100 years old, and at the time they seemed new. A consolation is that preservationists are better organized now.

  3. Pingback: BRUTALIST BUILDINGS UNDER ATTACK. | Pater Familias

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.