<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CARLYLE AND JOHNSON AND THE CASH NEXUS.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philipschaefer.com/2009/01/29/1445/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philipschaefer.com/2009/01/29/1445/</link>
	<description>Theories, observations, and articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:03:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://philipschaefer.com/2009/01/29/1445/comment-page-1/#comment-2161</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipschaefer.com/?p=1445#comment-2161</guid>
		<description>I like the personal touch, so I was struck by Samuel Johnson&#039;s comment that a personal relationship can create anxieties. I was told by a Virginian many years ago that he was shocked by the way Northeners would buy something without first having a personal discussion with the sales person. Now, as for Carlyle, he always shocks me when he talks about class or slavery. For example, from the link (Carlyle is I think longing for feudalism): &quot;the old Aristocracy were the governors of the Lower Classes, the guides of the Lower Classes;  and even, at bottom, that they existed as an Aristocracy because they were found adequate for that.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the personal touch, so I was struck by Samuel Johnson&#8217;s comment that a personal relationship can create anxieties. I was told by a Virginian many years ago that he was shocked by the way Northeners would buy something without first having a personal discussion with the sales person. Now, as for Carlyle, he always shocks me when he talks about class or slavery. For example, from the link (Carlyle is I think longing for feudalism): &#8220;the old Aristocracy were the governors of the Lower Classes, the guides of the Lower Classes;  and even, at bottom, that they existed as an Aristocracy because they were found adequate for that.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Weisfelder</title>
		<link>http://philipschaefer.com/2009/01/29/1445/comment-page-1/#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Weisfelder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipschaefer.com/?p=1445#comment-2160</guid>
		<description>Neutrality may simply mean impersonal without any sense of human connection. To be really trite, let me contrast Lionel Barrymore as Henry Potter and Jimmy Stewart as George Bailey in &quot;A Wonderful Life.&quot; Economic exchange probably has better long term consequences when it occurs within some sense of community, shared values and/or face to face interaction.

Is that &quot;nostalgia for feudalism?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neutrality may simply mean impersonal without any sense of human connection. To be really trite, let me contrast Lionel Barrymore as Henry Potter and Jimmy Stewart as George Bailey in &#8220;A Wonderful Life.&#8221; Economic exchange probably has better long term consequences when it occurs within some sense of community, shared values and/or face to face interaction.</p>
<p>Is that &#8220;nostalgia for feudalism?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

