LUCY VAN PELT ON THE FINANCIAL CRISIS. Lucy Van Pelt in PEANUTS once asked, “Why are there ups and downs? Why aren’t there just ups and ups and ups?” Economists differ on whether there could be ups and ups and ups. That is, they differ on whether the economy could find– with the help of wise policy makers—a long-term growth path so that excesses in either direction would be avoided. Imagine an economy that grew at about two or three per cent every year, with low inflation rates and low rates of unemployment. From time to time, various outside events (“exogenous events”) or mistakes in government policy might cause episodes of inflation or of excess unemployment, but such episodes are not inevitable. The alternative view, of course, is that booms and busts are the natural state of the economy. Kids, which way do you think of the economy?
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- THE EUROZONE—A CHICKEN GAME WHERE EVERY MEMBER CAN BLOW IT UP? (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This is not a matter of chicken. These are all turkeys.
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
Meta
I think the occasional big downturn has to happen. Even when I was really ignorant about economics I didn’t think economies (no matter how advanced they might be) could build steam forever. I doubt I could have given a real reason for this belief.
Pingback: ANSWERING YESTERDAY’S QUESTION. | Pater Familias
Essentially, I agree with Lee.
I wish I’d answered this as soon as I had the answer, because I was pondering this question in bed the other night after I read it. Alas, I remained in bed. Now I can’t remember the wording of my answer that well. I would say, though, that I have always assumed ups and downs would occur in markets… I don’t know where I got this assumption, but it’s a pretty old one. Trying to examine it now, I would say that ups and downs occur because of new products that take off or fail, old products that continue to sell well or to falter, and companies that acquire each other or don’t. Then there are the world events (notably disasters… do GOOD things affect markets as much as natural disasters and human-made attacks?) that affect markets.
If I remember the answer I came up with the other night while waiting for sleep, I will post it here.
Lucy Van Pelt also had this to say about her bout with the flu:
Other Person: Yes, I hear a lot of that is going around.
Lucy: But this is different. It’s happening to ME.