JOURNALS OF NEGATIVE RESULTS. The Economist article on the explanations advanced by Ioannidis for why so many scientific articles in prestigious journals are wrong says that “There also seems to be a bias towards publishing positive results…. even though negative results are potentially just as informative as positive results, if not as exciting.” For the last thirty years my brother Elmer has been saying that there should be a journal of negative results. There is hope. Now there are several journals of negative results, including journals in biomedicine, ecology and evolutionary biology, and natural language processing.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- Gary Nuetzel on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Francesca on EATING PEAS WITH A KNIFE.
- avon wilsmore on CHEATING IN CHAMPIONSHIP BRIDGE.
- Anonymous on THE LANGUAGE WEIRDNESS INDEX.
- James Friscia on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Lickity Splitfingers on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- David Quemere on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Nicholas Schaefer on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
Meta
Pingback: REQUIRED SHARING OF NEGATIVE RESULTS. | Pater Familias
Pingback: LOTS OF NEW JOURNALS OF NEGATIVE RESULTS. | Pater Familias
Pingback: A JOURNAL OF REPLICATED RESULTS. | Pater Familias