CONCRETE OR WOOD? In the article I linked to yesterday on the remodeling of Saarinen’s library at the University of Chicago Law School, I counted five references to the use of wood to make the new interior more comfortable. One of the drawbacks for the architecture of the sixties is that reinforced concrete was a fashionable material for buildings. One reason it was fashionable was the enormous influence of the architect Le Corbusier, who is quoted here as saying, “I have given my life to concrete.” This review of an exhibit in Poland begins: “Concrete Legacy: From Le Corbusier to the Homeboys focuses on concrete block housing as one of the gravest consequences of Modernist architectural thought. Large, prefabricated concrete slabs, used in entire housing developments, individual blocks and individual dwellings, continue to determine living conditions for, and shape the thinking of, millions of people.” Not surprisingly, people don’t like interior concrete walls. Architects seemed to know this. The interior walls of concrete buildings were often striated to evoke the feeling that wood gives.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- THE EUROZONE—A CHICKEN GAME WHERE EVERY MEMBER CAN BLOW IT UP? (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This is not a matter of chicken. These are all turkeys.
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
Meta
Not necessarily modernist: Think Amsterdam and its canals lined with splendid buildings and pretty, gabled houses. Like all other buildings in Holland, the interior walls of those buildings and houses are made of brick or concrete since the water and weather prevents the use of wood construction. And what does a Dutch family want you to say on entering their house — that it is behaaglijk — cozy. But I do agree that Dutch housing may help shape Dutch thought. But that’s a different subject.
Remembering all those Greenwich village unplastered walls, I think of brick interior walls as cozy too. But I found all those massive concrete walls in the sixties very depressing, although where there were such walls, there was usually no attempt at other amenities for the people inside the building. I’d love to hear your thoughts on Dutch housing and Dutch thought.
Pingback: SAVING BRUTALIST BUILDINGS—PAUL RUDOLPH. | Pater Familias