“ONCE-IN-A-LIFETIME CIRCUMSTANCES.” I continue my debate with myself on how much to blame the bankers. Sir Howard Davies in an article in the Financial Times for October 1, writes that: “These are highly unusual, once-in-a-lifetime circumstances, and it is not reasonable to expect that all financial institutions could have positioned themselves to survive market conditions of this severity.” His recognition of how unusual the situation is appears to support the view that I should not blame the bankers. But his phrasing calls attention to the fact that there are financial institutions all over the world that did not take the risks that the banks we are reading about took. Because they didn’t, we haven’t heard as much about them.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- ADAPTING GATSBY. (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: I think these are crucial, important decisions, what to leave out of any literary work, maybe any...
- DAMIEN HIRST—AN ART MARKET BUBBLE?. (1)
- Kate Bush: I hope you enjoy my visit to the Damien Hirst show as much as I did The Technical Impossibility of...
- THE MOST IMPORTANT EPISODE OF THE SIMPSONS ? (COMMENT). (1)
- Nick: Homer does has success as the team’s best hitter until Mr. Burns places a bet with a rival factory owner...
- THE “RIGHT TO EDIT”. (1)
- Lee: A relevant Simpsons clip.
- ULYSSES—VIRGINIA WOOLF LIKED THE BOOK, DESPISED THE AUTHOR. (3)
- A DEFENSE OF INVASIVE SPECIES. (3)
- Dick Weisfelder: Today’s Toledo Blade has an article on the importation of live Asian carp to Canada to serve...
- Lee: The downside is that red squirrels are way cuter than their gray cousins. Hitchens on the subject.
- THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT). (5)
- frank martin: Have been in a an Al only Roto league since 91… started at Ohio University were we all went to...
- DEATH OF A BUMBLEBEE. (1)
- Nick: By contrast, I remember witnessing the entire thing. I was surprised by Annalisa’s reaction and...
- ANOTHER VOTE ON UMBRIDGE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: When I look back at one of the Potter books, it’s usually this one. There are just a lot of...
- THE SCARIEST VILLAIN IN HARRY POTTER? (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: Didn’t we all meet her somewhere in grade or high school?
- ADAPTING GATSBY. (1)
Meta
Crashes are not unprecedented — not at all. The S and L crash occurred only 20 years ago. If we included the dot com crash and the batch of Enron-type accounting frauds, we would have four crashes in those twenty years; hardly once-in-a-lifetime. Should those crashes be included? I don’t remember much fraud in the dot-com bubble, and the Enron scandals don’t seem as widespread as the 1988 and 2008 scandals. Perhaps one could start to classify crashes. Some, such as the OPEC-generated problems, don’t seem to be due to moral hazard. Some accounting frauds, such as the kinds Abraham Briloff used to point out, are not as easily replicated as the 1988 and 2008 frauds and so not as widespread. Another feature of big crashes is excessive leverage for many enterprises. A subcategory is the placing of the same large bet by many firms. This feature — failure to recognize a lack of diversification — might be unusually significant here, but basically the people placing these bets did a lousy job of risk management. I’m also impressed by this remark: “If you’re too big to fail, you’re too big.” Elmer
Pingback: TOO INVOLVED TO FAIL? | Pater Familias
Pingback: WE WERE HERE TEN YEARS AGO (COMMENT). | Pater Familias
Pingback: ANSWERING YESTERDAY’S QUESTION. | Pater Familias