HOW THE FREE TRADE MOVEMENT CHANGED POLITICAL ARGUMENT. In 19th century England, there was a dramatic change in the way that people looked at government and society. The language of Utilitarianism is so familiar today that we forget how radical was Jeremy Bentham’s phrase, “The greatest good for the greatest number.” I now realize that in reading about the centuries that came before Bentham, I just have not come across the concept that it was good to advance the interests of the majority of citizens. Peter Clarke, in his review in the July 18 Times Literary Supplement of Frank Trentman’s FREE TRADE NATION, writes about how the movement for free trade (Clarke and Trentman refer to the movement as “FREE TRADE”) changed the terms of political debate forever. Arguments for free trade weigh large losses to producers (land owners) and small gains to a much larger number of consumers. Clarke says, “At root, then, the argument was about living standards for the mass of the people—regarded always as consumers and citizens.” Clarke quotes Trentman: “’The achievement of Free Trade was to invent a much more generalized language of the consumer as a public, national interest.’”
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
Meta