THE RELATIVE POVERTY OF VERY POOR PEOPLE. The new approach I posted on yesterday takes into account concepts of relative poverty in setting the new guideline of $1.25 a day. The authors argue that relative poverty (whether my neighbor is better off than I am) begins to matter when per person consumption rises past $1.95. There are two reasons that I don’t think that “relative poverty” concepts should be used for comparisons among the poor and very poor. Emphasizing relative poverty for the wretchedly poor suggests that being poor is less painful if others around you are equally poor. I just don’t believe that. Second, and more importantly, it suggests that relieving absolute poverty is not desirable (or less desirable) if the improvement doesn’t happen across the board and in lock step. Relieving absolute poverty is too difficult and too important to impose that kind of restriction.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
Meta
Pingback: LOCKSTEP (QUALIFICATION). | Pater Familias