DOES PERSONALITY COME FROM NATURE OR NURTURE? Carol Tavris says in her review of Daniel Nettle’s PERSONALITY that “Behavioural-genetic studies have consistently found that the heritability of personality traits… is around 50 per cent”—that is, attributable to genetic differences. But the shared environment of the home has only a weak correlation with personality traits. “Nurture”—defined and measured broadly—has little measurable effect on personality. There is speculation that individual life events and choices account for the other fifty per cent, but I think the best way to summarize the review is that there is no agreement on the remaining fifty per cent. All this leaves a lot of room for novelists. And maybe, as I posted on here, on Colin McGinn’s view of Shakespeare, it leaves a person free in part to choose a personality.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
Meta
There’s a difference between environment and between individual experience.
For example, a childhood friend and I grew up in the same town, with attentive, affluent parents. This incident occurs at age 3. Let’s say my mom takes me with her while she shops at Palmer’s, an upscale grocery store, and his mom takes him with her while she shops at Stew Leonard’s, another upscale grocery store.
Now, Stew Leonard’s has all kinds of “wacky” stuff in the store that they claim is for kids – dancing animatronic milk cartons and broccoli and so forth. They also have a cow the size of the Hindenburg on the wall that will moo if you push a button.
Childhood friend might have some sort of phobia or uncertainty or something based on that event which would never have been picked up on in a study looking for “environment”.
Pingback: OCTOPUSES AND PEOPLE. | Pater Familias