EVIDENCE THAT ROME WAS A MARKET ECONOMY.

EVIDENCE THAT ROME WAS A MARKET ECONOMY. With admirable fair mindedness, two days after posting the article I linked to yesterday, which argued that Rome was never a market economy, Arnold Kling on his own blog linked to strong evidence to the contrary. He linked to a wonderful review by James McCormick of THE FALL OF ROME AND THE END OF CIVILIZATION by Bryan Ward-Perkins. Kling writes, “Ward-Perkins’ thesis is that Rome created a strong economy based on trade, and that living standards collapsed when Rome fell.” Ward-Perkins relies on the archeological record for his thesis. Kling quotes McCormick: “The distribution of artifacts and discarded pottery and coinage establishes a massive and vital commercial economy, geared to satisfying the appetites of humble and modest customers….[S]oldiers stationed in Wales and Mesopotamia … were paid in gold, many were literate, and … they had access to hundreds of different well-made and mass-produced items of ordinary daily use.”

This entry was posted in Economics, History. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to EVIDENCE THAT ROME WAS A MARKET ECONOMY.

  1. Pingback: MOUNT TESTACCIO. | Pater Familias

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>