MOBY-DICK AND CAREFUL EDITING. I said yesterday in my post on James Wood’s essay on translations of WAR AND PEACE that the New Yorker has published two articles recently which question the value of careful editing and fine writing. Adam Gopnik wrote the other article in the New Yorker for October 22. (Only this abstract is available on the internet.) Gopnik writes about the new Orion series of abridgments of masterpieces such as MOBY-DICK, ANNA KARENINA, and VANITY FAIR. Gopnik praises the editing: “MOBY-DICK…is, by conventional contemporary standards of good editing and critical judgment IMPROVED [in italics in original].” The result is “the ‘taut, spare, driving’ narrative beloved of Sunday reviewers.” However, Gopnik winds up lamenting the skillful editing because “it turns a hysterical, half-mad masterpiece into a sound, sane book.”
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
Meta
I laughed at the description of Moby-Dick as “a hysterical, half-mad masterpiece” but I can definitely appreciate what Gopnik was saying, even without having read the book. In writing, style and substance are not so separated as one might think. The style of writing has so great of an impact on the reading experience, I used to value style over plot. Learning to write and reading the Harry Potter books has taught me to appreciate plot a whole lot more than I used to, to the point where a weak plot annoys me more than a spare style of writing. However, it’s style I keep coming back to when I think about my favorite books. The Lord of the Rings is commonly lauded for the immensely detailed world-building, but my favorite thing about it has always been the style of writing (especially in the hobbity parts) and the characters.
As a Lord of the Rings maniac, I will agree that the dialogue was one of the strongest points of the books. Although, as a historian-in-training, I found the incredibly detailed historical background to every element of the environment to be what made it truly special.
Pingback: Pater Familias » CAN PROUST BE ABRIDGED?