CLASSIC, ROMANTIC AND STANDUP. The argument as to whether a comedian should be like Jerry Seinfeld and observe ordinary people or should explore human nature by portraying the unusual is like the argument in literature and art between classic and romantic. In the essay linked, Walter Jackson Bate has a lot of helpful distinctions. Like Seinfeld, the classic is not interested in the artist’s subjective feelings. For the classic, insight rather than originality is important. The subject matter is what is “permanent” rather than “isolated and particular”–not so different from a focus on what people generally do. It is not seeking “a change from our daily lives” or “inventive or technical cleverness on the part of the artist.” On the other hand, Romanticism deals with “misunderstood heroic individuals and artists.” Rick Shapiro, the comedian praised in the Ron Rosenbaum article I posted on yesterday, could be considered a misunderstood heroic artist.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
Meta
My philosophy is probably well known to the readers of this blog. The keys to me are along the same lines as yours, that the primary goal is to make the audience laugh.
Personally, I have found that often the material choses you. I have tried to do observational humor, and I generally just can’t do it well. What I can do is tell stories, particularly about myself. I’m getting better with observation – as evidenced by my lithium segment – but that’s still a hybrid bit.