SHAKESPEARE WAS A BLACK SWAN (COMMENT).

Posted on September 16, 2007 by Philip

SHAKESPEARE WAS A BLACK SWAN (COMMENT). Nick commented on the suggestion by Derek Jacobi (that Shakespeare’s work was probably written by a committee) that people have trouble accepting that there can be somebody who is four or five standard deviations above the norm. He then notes that there have been billions of people. The probability of a very unusual event, one that is four or five standard deviations above the norm, is much more likely if the coin is tossed a billion times. Nassim Nicholas Taleb has a new book, THE BLACK SWAN The Impact of the Highly Improbable, which is all about events which he calls “Black Swans.” He defines a Black Swan as having three characteristics: (1) it is an outlier, (2) it has an extreme impact, and (3) people think up explanations for it after the fact. In these terms, explaining Shakespeare’s genius by claiming he was born a nobleman or that he had a university education is representative of the third characteristic. And claiming that Shakespeare’s work was done by a committee is comparable to claiming that there were several Black Swans writing together.

This entry was posted in Economics, Literature, Shakespeare. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to SHAKESPEARE WAS A BLACK SWAN (COMMENT).

  1. Catherine says:
    September 17, 2007 at 3:25 PM

    I have to wonder about man’s need to explain away the incredible and unlikely. If we gave up on achieving or hoping for the improbable, where would humanity be? I suppose no one will truly know for certain about the works of Shakespeare, but I think it is important to believe in them in order to inspire ourselves to higher levels and maintain hope that humanity is capable of truly great things.

  2. Annalisa says:
    September 19, 2007 at 4:14 PM

    I agree with Catherine’s words. At this point, Shakespeare represents something sacred and beautiful, made only more potent by the many attempts to explain away his genius. He is not just his work now; he is also a symbol of achievement, individuality, innovation, and so much more. And despite my penchant for asking “why?” and getting answered, in some ways I find nature’s mysteries all the more awe inspiring when there isn’t any explanation at all.

  3. Lee says:
    September 19, 2007 at 4:40 PM

    Last week in my feminist literary theory class we were discussing why Virginia Woolf used Shakespeare as the yardstick of literary achievement. I thought, if not Shakespeare, who? I can’t think of another playwright (or even perhaps another writer) for me that hit so many out of the park consistently.

    Mr. Schaefer, I’ve heard you say that when you go to see a Shakespeare play you know you’re in for a good time and I must say I agree (making exceptions for particularly bad stagings, of course).

    Looking up Woolf quotes regarding Shakespeare I found (and agree with) this:

    Fiction is like a spider’s web, attached ever so lightly perhaps, but still attached to life at all four corners. Often the attachment is scarcely perceptible; Shakespeare’s plays, for instance, seem to hang there complete by themselves. But when the web is pulled askew, hooked up at the edge, torn in the middle, one remembers that these webs are not spun in midair by incorporeal creatures, but are the work of suffering human beings, and are attached to the grossly material things, like health and money and the houses we live in.

  4. Philip says:
    September 19, 2007 at 8:21 PM

    I agree with Catherine that Shakespeare represents a peak that humanity can aspire to because it was reached once. In thinking about Catherine’s comment, I said to Mary Jane that we are very lucky that our two greatest writers in English, Chaucer and Shakespeare, were also outstanding in their tolerance for human frailties. Mary Jane responded that Shakespeare and Chaucer were not merely tolerant of human frailties. They cherished them.

  5. Pingback: PREDICTING BLACK SWANS AT THE BEGINNING OF 2008. | Pater Familias

  6. Pingback: PICKING UP NICKELS IN FRONT OF A STEAMROLLER. | Pater Familias

  7. Pingback: CONSOLATIONS OF PHILOSOPHY–WE ARE ALL BLACK SWANS. | Pater Familias

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>