CAT BONDS. This article by Michael Lewis (author of MONEYBALL) will disappear soon. Kids, I suggest you read it while you have the chance. Lewis describes catastrophe bonds (“cat bonds” for short). If you were to buy a catastrophe bond for a million dollars which is triggered by a hurricane hitting Miami some time in the next five years, and no hurricanes hit Miami during that period, you would get your million dollars back at the end of five years and would have collected a high rate of interest during the period (a high rate of interest to compensate for the risk you ran). If there were a Miami hurricane during the period, you might get only some of your million dollars back. If the hurricane were bad enough, you would get nothing back at the end of five years. Insurance companies that insure against rare events with enormous damage will sell cat bonds to spread their risk. The market has taken off since Hurricane Katrina.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- THE EUROZONE—A CHICKEN GAME WHERE EVERY MEMBER CAN BLOW IT UP? (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This is not a matter of chicken. These are all turkeys.
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
Meta
Buying a cat bond sounds a bit like becoming a “name” for Lloyds. I think the differences are that a name committed to a particular syndicate that then wrote a portfolio of insurance policies and a name had unlimited liability if there were losses. A few years ago a number of syndicates at Lloyds got wiped out, leading to lawsuits, I think filed in the US, alleging that there had been inadequate disclosure. I remember reading, with what I guess must be schadenfreude — which seems to be too satisfying to feel guilty about — that some of the names had gotten the impression that they just got nice checks without any downside. One young woman remarked that she should have warned her parents when she noticed that all the people she knew who went to work for Lloyds were well born, well connected, and stupid. I think that Justice Breyer had to recuse himself from Lloyds cases when he was on the First Circuit because he had been a name in quite a few syndicates. Elmer
Pingback: CAT BONDS AND THE JAPANESE EARTHQUAKE | Pater Familias
Pingback: UPDATE—CATASTROPHE BONDS. | Pater Familias