A RANDOM WALK ON THE STOCK MARKET (COMMENT). Annalisa commented that she has the impression regarding the stock exchange that “there appears to be a good deal of randomness as to which stocks do well and which decline.” The comment amazes me because the work related to the Random Walk Hypothesis, the idea that stock prices move randomly, is one of the great achievements in economics in my lifetime. As the wikipedia link points out, a related idea is that successful basketball shots also follow a random walk, a theory that I questioned here. There is a theory that underlies the random walk hypothesis. It is argued that if there were a pattern to stock prices, traders would notice it and make trades until the pattern disappeared.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
Meta
Pingback: Pater Familias » WHY ARE THERE SO MANY FINANCIAL BAZILLIONAIRES?
Pingback: Pater Familias » MEGAN MCARDLE ASKS: “HOW CAN MARKETS BE EFFICIENT IF PEOPLE ARE SUCH MORONS?”
Pingback: BUY AND HOLD. | Pater Familias
Pingback: FINDING A PATTERN IN RANDOMNESS. | Pater Familias
Pingback: LESSONS: THINGS DON’T GO STRAIGHT UP. | Pater Familias
Pingback: DRUNKEN WALKS? | Pater Familias