TELLING THE STORY OF YOUR LIFE. This article describes a branch of psychological research that I was unaware of. The research is based on analyzing two-hour interviews in which people tell their life stories. One conclusion is familiar: that it matters whether you tell your life story focusing on things that went wrong or on lucky turns of plot, a variant of the glass half full metaphor. Dan McAdams, who may have originated the line of research, speaks of the optimistic point of view as a redemption story line which he thinks is important in American history and literature. People do better when they view problems as challenges to be overcome rather than as character flaws. Another finding is that people who can look at painful past situations from a third person’s perspective rather than as a vivid first person memory deal with those situations better. I guess this last result would argue that actors should be better grounded than most people–contrary to popular conception– because they are trained to look at things from the spectator’s point of view. Unless, of course, they take the risk of relying too much on emotional recall.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- ADAPTING GATSBY. (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: I think these are crucial, important decisions, what to leave out of any literary work, maybe any...
- DAMIEN HIRST—AN ART MARKET BUBBLE?. (1)
- Kate Bush: I hope you enjoy my visit to the Damien Hirst show as much as I did The Technical Impossibility of...
- THE MOST IMPORTANT EPISODE OF THE SIMPSONS ? (COMMENT). (1)
- Nick: Homer does has success as the team’s best hitter until Mr. Burns places a bet with a rival factory owner...
- THE “RIGHT TO EDIT”. (1)
- Lee: A relevant Simpsons clip.
- ULYSSES—VIRGINIA WOOLF LIKED THE BOOK, DESPISED THE AUTHOR. (3)
- A DEFENSE OF INVASIVE SPECIES. (3)
- Dick Weisfelder: Today’s Toledo Blade has an article on the importation of live Asian carp to Canada to serve...
- Lee: The downside is that red squirrels are way cuter than their gray cousins. Hitchens on the subject.
- THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT). (5)
- frank martin: Have been in a an Al only Roto league since 91… started at Ohio University were we all went to...
- DEATH OF A BUMBLEBEE. (1)
- Nick: By contrast, I remember witnessing the entire thing. I was surprised by Annalisa’s reaction and...
- ANOTHER VOTE ON UMBRIDGE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: When I look back at one of the Potter books, it’s usually this one. There are just a lot of...
- THE SCARIEST VILLAIN IN HARRY POTTER? (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: Didn’t we all meet her somewhere in grade or high school?
- ADAPTING GATSBY. (1)
Meta
I disagree. Actors don’t look at things from a spectator’s point of view. They are trained to look at things from the perspective of their own characters. It is called “justification.” I remember a young man I knew years ago who told me he had ruined a production of “Oklahoma” by playing Judd Frye so sympathetically, that Curly, the hero, came out looking like a nasty murderer. He had overdone the justification.
The person who looks at the play from the spectator’s point of view is the director. And that’s why it’s so hard to be in a play you’re directing. You don’t get the perspective from “out there” when you’re in the scene.